Breaking it Down: Understanding the Differences Between Emsculpt and CoolSculpting

Both Emsculpt and CoolSculpting treatments are FDA-approved, safe, and effective. The certified specialists use only the most advanced techniques and devices. Before making these treatments available to the public, they have been proven and tested after years of clinical trials. CoolSculpting has been in the market for over ten years, whereas EmSculpt is relatively new.

Emsculpt vs Coolsculpting:Work Principle

Emsculpt treatment tones muscle cells and stimulates muscle growth through the use of HIFEM (high intensity focused electromagnetic energy). There is no supramaximal contraction in muscles during a workout at the gym. 20,000 crunches or squats are equivalent to one 30-minute session. In this manner, muscle mass is enhanced while fat is reduced simultaneously.

CoolSculpting uses controlled cooling to freeze away stubborn bulges that resist diet and exercise. It is currently the most popular non-surgical fat reduction treatment with millions of procedures performed worldwide.

Scientific studies have shown that CoolSculpting can reduce fat by 25% after a single treatment. These results are long-lasting. CoolSculpting works via a process known as cryolipolysis. During the fat freezing treatment, isolated deposits of fat are exposed to precisely calculated temperatures. It freezes subcutaneous fat cells without harming the overlying skin or surrounding tissue. Once fat cells are frozen, they are damaged permanently and trigger the natural process of cell destruction and removal known as apoptosis. Over several weeks, the immune system gathers the destroyed fat cells and excretes them from the body in the form of waste. Once fat cells are removed from the body, they cannot grow back, leading to long-term results.

Emsculpt vs Coolsculpting:Treatment Area

Best areas for Emsculpt treatment:

1. Abs(abdomen)
2. Arms (biceps and triceps)
3. Legs (calves)
4. Buttocks (gluteals)

Best areas for CoolSculpting treatment:

1. Double chin
2. Thighs
3. Abdomen
4. Flanks
5. Bra fat
6. Back fat
7. Underneath the buttocks (banana roll fat)
8. Upper arms (bingo wings)

Emsculpt vs Coolsculpting:Results

Emsculpt treatments are shorter, taking approximately 30 minutes. However, a client would need a minimum of 4 sessions, spaced 2-3 days apart to experience optimal results.

Emsculpt results in a 19% average reduction in fat stores after 2-4 weeks post-treatment, so slightly less than CoolSculpting. But it excels when it comes to building muscle. Clients achieve a 16% average increase in muscle mass at their targeted treatment zones. Many clients witness a firmer and more sculpted physique around 4 weeks after having their final treatment session.

A typical CoolSculpting treatment takes between 35 to 60 minutes to complete. Two treatment sessions are usually enough. But if a client wants to target multiple areas, then up to 6 treatments are recommended, spaced one month apart for best results.

In just one treatment, clients can see up to a 27% reduction in their subcutaneous fat stores. It can take several weeks for fat removal to show. As the body metabolizes the crystallized fat cells. Most patients see visible results within just a couple of weeks. These will remain indefinitely if you adopt a healthy lifestyle regime to maintain the fat loss results.

Emsculpt vs Coolsculpting:Ideal Candidates

Emsculpt is better suited to clients who want to redefine and sculpt their bodies while gaining a more toned and trim physique. If you visit the gym regularly but want to increase your gains, then this treatment is ideal. Clients with pinchable excess fat around their six-packs or calve muscles for example are more likely to benefit from EMSculpt.if you want to improve muscle definition while trimming your figure, then Emsculpt is more suitable.

If you have significant fat bulges or hard-to-shift fat stores that are unremovable despite exercise, then CoolSculpting is an ideal option. It also suits people who have higher BMIs, including those who are considered overweight or obese.So if significant fat removal is your goal, then opt for CoolSculpting’s permanent fat reduction treatment.

Emsculpt vs Coolsculpting:Taboo Group

Emsculpt is NOT for:

• Pregnant women
• Women with IUD implants
• People with metal implants

CoolSculpting is NOT for:

• Pregnant or breastfeeding
• Suffering from auto-immune disorders
• Have a history of hernia
• Have a BMI above 34
• Had body contouring treatments in the past year
• Have a history of eating disorders

Emsculpt vs Coolsculpting:Side Effects

Emsculpt has undergone extensive clinical testing and has been found to be safe by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.The most typical negative effect of Emsculpt maybe minor muscle pain, similar to how you might feel after a vigorous workout. 

Patients who get CoolSculpting will suffer mild redness and perhaps numbness for a few hours to days after treatment. If a patient is troubled by this, their wardrobe options may be restricted.

Emsculpt vs Coolsculpting:Cost

As the cost is affected by too many factors like service location,treatment area,experience of service provider...so here we only compare a estimated price of both treatments.

Generally, a single Emsculpt treatment session costs between $500 to $1,000,and a single CoolSculpting treatment session costs around $2000.

Combining the Emsculpt and CoolSculpting 

While combining the two treatments, clients can achieve the best results. If you have a range of areas across your body that would benefit from both fat minimization and muscle strengthening, then using both technologies can create great results. Use CoolSculpting first to minimize fat stores across hard-to-tackle areas. Think banana rolls below the buttocks, fat across the chest or bra fat, and double chins for example – basically, the areas that cannot be treated using EMSculpt or EMSculpt Neo.

We can then utilize EMSculpt to increase muscle strength across core body zones. The people care about most (like the abs and buttocks). When you blend these concentrated treatments, you can contour and shape your body in a much more strategic way.

This is why these treatments have become so popular for people who care about enhancing their bodies in a safe way without the need for invasive surgery like liposuction. Over 8 million CoolSculpting treatments have been performed worldwide, while EMSculpt is carried out over 3000 times each year in the UK. So if you need a body contouring treatment that is trusted and highly sought after, then EMSculpt and CoolSculpting are great options to choose from.

Emsculpt and CoolSculpting each excel in their own important area of body contouring.Many clients are looking for a complete transformation of their appearance. They combine Emsculpt with CoolSculpting together, the two treatments can reduce belly fat and replace it with sculpted, contoured abs.

Factors To Consider When Choose One of Them

1. Difference of Purpose: Gradual fat reduction vs. thickening and toning of muscles

This is the main and most important difference between CoolSculpting and Emsculpt. CoolSculpting is the gold standard non-surgical fat reduction treatment. It is the best option for clients who want to reduce stubborn fat bulges on the abs, thighs, back, hips, flanks, banana rolls, upper arms, or under the chin. It works by delivering intense cold temperatures through the skin. It directly causes a portion of the fat cells in the treatment area to shrink and die permanently. It helps you lose excess fat in that specific area you target to reshape.

Emsculpt works in a completely different way. This machine causes muscles in an area to make tens of thousands of contractions during the treatment. It is as if you were doing impossibly large numbers of crunches or squats in a short period of time. Emsculpt is designed to help build new muscle fibers. It tones existing fibers for better-sculpted muscles. It’s currently indicated to treat the abs, buttocks, thighs, and upper arms.

Emsculpt would imitate the effects of exercising and potentially help you slim down. the thickening and toning of muscles can make your clothes feel tighter.
There can be some residual fat reduction as a result. However, fat reduction is not the main goal with Emsculpt. If you have even a moderate-fat layer over your muscles, you won’t be able to appreciate fully the results of Emsculpt. In fact, many fitness experts recommend getting CoolSculpting first and then using Emsculpt as a follow-up treatment to refine the results.

2. Difference in Technology: Cryolipolysis vs. Electromagnetism

CoolSculpting uses fat-freezing technology called cryolipolysis. The CoolSculpting applicator slightly suctions the skin and fatty tissue into the cooling cups. They are brought to a controlled temperature. The temperature is cold enough to stimulate fat cells to die. But it is not that cold to harm the skin, muscle, or nerve tissue.

Emsculpt uses high-intensity focused electromagnetic technology (HIFEM). It is to induce involuntary supramaximal muscle contractions in the treatment area. Supramaximal contractions engage 100% of the muscle fibers in an area. It helps to tone the muscle faster than exercise alone. Emsculpt does not destroy fat cells directly. Although some clients have reported minor fat reduction as a side effect of treatment.

3. Safety: Both procedures are FDA-cleared, painless, and non-surgical.

However, CoolSculpting has an established history of safe and effective results
It’s been FDA-cleared since 2010 and has a proven safety and effectiveness track record. The procedure has been performed globally over 6 million times. The first few days after an acupuncture treatment are often accompanied by temporary numbness, pain, and slight swelling. But the serious side effects are rare. The level of comfort varies from client to client and from body area to body area during treatment, but the vast majority say that CoolSculpting was comfortable after an initial few minutes of intense cold.

Both CoolSculpting and Emsculpt are FDA-cleared, non-invasive procedures. Under the supervision of a well-trained technical staff and fitness experts, the risk of adverse effects with either treatment is very low.

Emsculpt is the most latest technology. But also has a good safety record so far. The machine forces muscle contractions. You can feel it. You can describe this feeling like a little unnatural as your body is doing an involuntary workout. Emsculpt is not safe for people with metallic or electronic implants. For example, an artificial joint or a pacemaker candidate can not get this treatment since it is an electromagnetic treatment.

Both CoolSculpting and Emsculpt are non-invasive, with no anesthesia, needles, or incisions required. In well-trained hands, the risk of adverse effects is very low. Neither treatment requires downtime. Although some clients take the rest of the day off due to post-treatment soreness. This is the only precaution after both the body contouring procedures.

It is important to choose a well-qualified service provider for either treatment. With CoolSculpting, it can make the difference between measurable fat loss and wasted time and money. Your service provider needs to have aesthetic medical training and knowledge of anatomy, proportion, and symmetry. It is to ensure a great result. With Emsculpt, the service provider must know how to tune the machine safely. Starting a client on too-high an intensity can cause damage.
It can be challenging to distinguish between various brands when there is such a large choice offered on the market. Even if you consider only non-surgical treatments, you need to consult with an experienced, reputable plastic surgeon before making any kind of investment. The well-regarded aestheticians are dedicated to the art and science of aesthetic treatments. They will provide accurate information about what different technologies and procedures can do for you.

Final Thought

Thanks to non-invasive treatments, you can now painlessly get rid of fat and achieve the body shape you desire. Body sculpting treatments (EmSculpt vs CoolSclupting) make use of advanced cosmetic technology that delivers promising, effective, and permanent results. The only difference is that EMSculpt is suited to a narrower range of target body areas, like the abs, legs, and buttocks.

Which treatment is better for you ultimately comes down to your goals and your body composition. As each treatment has a different purpose. If you want to reduce fat, CoolSculpting is your best bet. If you are lean and want to see better muscle definition in your abs, arms, or buttocks. Emsculpt may be a great option for you. If you’d like to learn more and have a try, you can visit Surebeauty and consult for detailed guidelines for the purpose.